The original need
The organization had a generic GoDaddy website. It needed a platform for courses and content management, supported by user accounts, payment integration, and email delivery.
My responsibility
I selected the technology stack and delivered the website and course platform. My work includes authentication, payment API integration, the database, DNS cutover, and service integrations. I continue to manage technical operations.
Why this design?
I selected the stack to control cost and make the platform easier for the management team to use. Payload supports content and course management. The supporting services handle authentication, payments, the database, and email.
The handoff is part of the design. The customer relations and marketing team manages content and some user administration. I manage the technical systems. Content is a collaborative contribution.
Published platform content
The live site includes book content and promotional artwork. The team manages this content. I manage the platform that publishes it.
Published artwork from Testimony House. These images show public content, not account or payment screens.
What was tested?
I tested sign-up, sign-in, payments, course access, and email delivery. These results are my account of the completed testing; this case study does not include exported test logs.
What happened?
The user flows passed my testing. The platform is fully live, and we continue to add functionality. The organization now has a course and content management platform in place of its earlier generic website.
This case study establishes the delivered capabilities. It does not claim measured sales growth, adoption, or cost savings.